Read the excerpt
Read at your own pace.
The PDF shows the designed pages. The text below contains the same selected reading material in a format that adapts to your screen.
Source PDF page 6
THE PERIOPERATIVE LEADER’S FIRST 90
1
Begin with the
Responsibilities of the
Appointment
Your clinical experience gives you a strong starting point. It does
not prepare you for every decision that comes with responsibility
for a perioperative service.
You may know the rooms, the surgeons and the work well. You can
anticipate a missing tray, recognize a strained team and help a
difficult day recover. Leadership adds another set of
responsibilities: deciding which problem deserves attention,
agreeing who can act, understanding the cost and checking whether
the change worked.
Those responsibilities begin before you feel fully prepared. A new
manager is still learning while payroll is due, a staffing concern
needs an answer and a surgeon wants a commitment. You need a
way to make sound decisions with incomplete information and to
recognize the decisions that require help.
This book helps you prepare those decisions. Start by confirming
your responsibilities with your leader, choose a useful next action
and review what happens. Build from there.
A working guide
This field guide is for your first ninety days, with tools you can
continue using as your responsibilities grow. It organizes the work
into six areas: leadership, operations, finance, analytics, strategy
and improvement.
Each chapter combines an operating question, practical examples,
reusable tools and a first action. The tools support your judgment;
they do not make the decision for you.
Source PDF page 7
THE PERIOPERATIVE LEADER’S FIRST 90
2
Scope and professional judgment
This is not a clinical text. Nothing here replaces technique, protocol,
patient-care decisions, or the requirements of your organization. It
is not a substitute for your organization’s policies, your human
resources partner, or professional legal and financial advice. Where
a chapter approaches those boundaries—and several do—it says so
plainly and tells you who to talk to.
Use the examples to organize your thinking, then replace their
assumptions with evidence from your own service. A hospital
operating room and an ambulatory surgery center may face similar
problems while having different governance, staffing and
resources.
Adjust the work to your level of responsibility
A manager may investigate a delay and coordinate an approved
local test. A director may need to resolve a dependency between
services, allocate resources or bring a recommendation to block
governance. An executive may decide enterprise priorities, capital
commitments or changes that affect several facilities. Titles alone do
not establish authority. Confirm the actual decision owner before
making a commitment.
For an interim appointment, also agree what must be stabilized,
what can be changed and what must be handed over. Use the same
reasoning at each level: define the issue, examine the evidence,
compare options, obtain the right decision and review the result.
How to Use It
Start with the responsibility in front of you. If you have just
accepted the role, use the appointment agreement below and
Chapters 1 and 2. For an operating or financial decision already
due, go directly to the relevant chapter and worked example. You
do not need to finish the book before using it.
Source PDF page 8
THE PERIOPERATIVE LEADER’S FIRST 90
3
Then use it as a reference. When the budget lands and you cannot
read it, go to Part Three. When the schedule will not behave, go to
Part Two. When you are avoiding a conversation, go to Part One.
The contents page is deliberately built around problems rather than
topics, so you can find the chapter you need by recognizing the
situation you are in.
During your first month, use the opening agreement and Chapters 1
and 2 while meeting your immediate responsibilities. If the
appointment is interim, confirm its scope, decision authority and
handover date.
Learn enough to make the next decision well. Respond promptly
when the situation cannot wait.
What you should leave with
By the end of your first working session, you should have a draft
appointment agreement or a clearly framed decision to discuss with
the appropriate leader. The time needed will depend on your access
to people and information.
Over the next ninety days, the aim is a manageable set of agreed
priorities, reliable working relationships and evidence about one
improvement. You will also need to identify what remains
unresolved and who must decide it.
Use the first tool that helps you make a clearer decision, then return
to the book when the next problem requires it.
Clarify your role and authority
Before changing the service, confirm the role with the person who
appointed you. Bring a draft that names the appointment period,
the responsibilities you own, decisions requiring approval, current
urgent concerns, available support and the first review date.
For an interim appointment, add a handover date or review trigger.
Confirm authority for spending, scheduling, personnel processes
Source PDF page 9
THE PERIOPERATIVE LEADER’S FIRST 90
4
and cross-department changes. A temporary title alone does not
establish those permissions.
Use the calendar as a planning aid. Address urgent risks, payroll
and other fixed deadlines, required reporting and active
operational responsibilities through the approved process while
you learn. Never delay a required response to finish this book.
Your first useful output is a one-page agreement you can explain to
the sponsor: what I own; what I must escalate; the first priority; the
support available; and when we review it.
Start here: the first useful conversation
Bring a draft appointment agreement to the leader who appointed
you. In this book, that person is the sponsor: the leader authorized
to confirm your scope and resolve decisions beyond it. If the
sponsor is unavailable, identify the designated covering leader. Do
not fill an authority gap by assuming permission.
The example below concerns a fictional interim manager in a six-
room perioperative service. The organization has asked for twelve
weeks of cover while recruiting a permanent manager. The
outgoing leader has left, two improvement projects remain open
and staff have heard different accounts of what the interim
manager can decide. The first task is to make the assignment
workable.
A completed appointment agreement
Question Illustrative agreement
Purpose and
period
Provide operational management for twelve weeks.
Maintain current required services and establish a
reliable handover for the permanent manager.
Responsibilities
now
Daily staffing coordination within approved rules; payroll
and required reporting; staff access to the manager;
review of outstanding operating issues.
Source PDF page 10
THE PERIOPERATIVE LEADER’S FIRST 90
5
Question Illustrative agreement
Decision
authority
Routine assignments within approved competency and
coverage rules. Director approval for new positions,
overtime exceptions, capital commitments and changes
affecting other departments. Formal HR decisions use the
required joint process.
Inherited
commitments
Two projects remain listed as active. Confirm their
sponsors, requirements, next deadlines and resources by
the first weekly review. Do not cancel required work.
First priority
Verify the reported first-case readiness problem and
bring a shared description of the issue to the director and
affected partners. No performance target is assumed
before definitions and baseline are checked.
Support and
access
Scheduled director review; identified finance and HR
contacts; access to current staffing, operating and project
records through approved systems.
Escalation and
coverage
Use established urgent-response and reporting routes.
Confirm who covers when the director or interim
manager is unavailable.
Review and
handover
Review the agreement at the end of week one and when
scope changes. Prepare an initial handover record by
week ten; confirm the receiving leader and final review
date.
The agreement is useful because it exposes decisions that the title
alone did not settle. The manager owns current duties, can
investigate the readiness issue and knows which commitments
require approval. The twelve-week appointment does not justify a
twelve-week pause in required work.
The conversation
“I want to confirm what you need from this appointment. My draft
gives priority to current operating responsibilities, a verified view of
the readiness issue and a usable handover. I can manage routine
assignments within the existing rules. I need your decision on the two
inherited projects and on the approval route for staffing exceptions.
Source PDF page 11
THE PERIOPERATIVE LEADER’S FIRST 90
6
What have I missed, and what would you change before I discuss the
assignment with the team?”
Record the decisions, including a disagreement or an unanswered
question. Send the agreed summary through the organization’s
normal route. A draft becomes an agreement when the responsible
people confirm it; completing the page by yourself does not do that.
Your matching working page
Use the same questions for your own appointment. Keep
confidential details in your organization’s approved records. Where
permitted, note a record reference here without copying sensitive
information. The full-page version in Working Pages provides more
writing space.
Question Your draft
Purpose and
appointment period
Responsibilities that
begin immediately
Decisions I own;
decisions requiring
approval
Inherited
commitments to
verify
First priority and
evidence needed
Support, access and
covering leader
Escalation route; first
review; handover
Source PDF page 12
THE PERIOPERATIVE LEADER’S FIRST 90
7
A practical first-week route
When Work and useful output
At appointment
Confirm immediate responsibilities, urgent-response
coverage, access and fixed deadlines. Output: a draft
appointment agreement with authority gaps
identified.
Early in the week
Meet the sponsor and the partners needed for
current decisions. Output: an agreed scope and a
short list of commitments with owners and dates.
Across the week
Listen to a range of staff and observe a relevant
process without disrupting care. Output: a question
to investigate, with facts separated from
assumptions.
Before the first review
Check one material operating claim with the metric
owner. Output: a definition and a reproducible
count, or a clear record of what is missing.
At the review
Present current duties, the evidence gathered and
the decision needed next. Output: an agreed next
action, support and review date.
Adapt the order when an urgent concern, payroll deadline or
another required task takes precedence. Your first week is
successful when the work is clearer and the next responsibilities
are agreed—not when every box in a generic plan has been
completed.
If you inherit a promise you cannot verify
A surgeon tells the interim manager that an additional Thursday
block was promised before the previous manager left. The schedule
has no approved change, and anesthesia and PACU have not
confirmed coverage. The manager should neither dismiss the
promise nor treat it as permission to book additional work.
“I understand that this was discussed before I arrived. I will check the
documented decision and the coverage required with the responsible
Source PDF page 13
THE PERIOPERATIVE LEADER’S FIRST 90
8
leaders. I cannot confirm the added block today. I will return by our
agreed review with the status and the options we can support.”
The next action is a record and capacity check. Confirm what was
approved, by whom, under which conditions and whether those
conditions still hold. If there is no complete decision, bring the
options to the authorized sponsor. Record the resulting
commitment so the next leader does not inherit the same
ambiguity.
Selected overall manuscript PDF pages 1, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13. Text and layout retained from the current author-review copy; final publication remains pending.
Educational examples are not facility policy, clinical instructions or a promise of career or operating results. Keep confidential details in approved systems.